3 ms·
It could be that it was intended to be ironic. The point could be to equate paternalistic concerns about human rights with colonialism.
by perl4ever 6y ago
It could be that it was intended to be ironic. The point could be to equate paternalistic concerns about human rights with colonialism.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- shaggyfrog 6y agoAs you can see by the reply, and the downvotes, it was a genuine statement.