3 ms·

Thanks, that tweet tempered my expectations much better than the article. Still nice to play around with it if I can!

deft 6y ago
That tweet is completely devoid of substance and if it truly changed your mind you are a mindless sheep just believing whatever Sam Altman and his crony of VCs tell you to.
- bobviolier 6y ago
  I mean, Sam Altman is just one of the founders and the CEO of OpenAI - so yeah, what does he know.
  - ohgodplsno 6y ago
    Legitimately, not a lot. Musk is a founder too, and no, he doesn't know anything about AI. The few actually technical people in there (Schulman, Sutskever, Zaramba) are the ones that know their stuff, yes. Musk, Altman, Brockman are basically nothing more than hype men with tech connections.
    - londons_explore 6y ago
      Careful with the tone of your response. Calling someone 'nothing more than a hype man' goes beyond constructive criticism of someone's behaviour...
      - ohgodplsno 6y ago
        That tone is very much wanted. It's not a criticism. It's what they are. And that's perfectly fine, they don't all need to bring a PhD to the table. But as it stands, in the context of AI knowledge, Altman and Musk are hype men for OpenAI. Yes, they probably handle financials, or set targets. But they're not indispensable to the well functioning of an AI company.
    - deleted 6y ago
      [deleted]
    - gkoberger 6y ago
      While maybe not as experienced in AI as some other people on the team, the people you mentioned have managed to secure $2bn+ in financing, brought together a group of incredible talented people in the field, and gave them a protected environment to build and experiment. Something like this requires a lot of different skills. There's probably zero companies out there where the CEO is the best engineer at the company; it requires different skills. I'll concede Musk is more of a figurehead (he's been gone for years), but Sam and Greg are incredibly involved and don't deserve your criticism.
- dang 6y ago
  Ok, but please don't post even more things that are devoid of substance.

deft 6y ago

That tweet is completely devoid of substance and if it truly changed your mind you are a mindless sheep just believing whatever Sam Altman and his crony of VCs tell you to.

bobviolier 6y ago
I mean, Sam Altman is just one of the founders and the CEO of OpenAI - so yeah, what does he know.
- ohgodplsno 6y ago
  Legitimately, not a lot. Musk is a founder too, and no, he doesn't know anything about AI. The few actually technical people in there (Schulman, Sutskever, Zaramba) are the ones that know their stuff, yes. Musk, Altman, Brockman are basically nothing more than hype men with tech connections.
  - londons_explore 6y ago
    Careful with the tone of your response. Calling someone 'nothing more than a hype man' goes beyond constructive criticism of someone's behaviour...
    - ohgodplsno 6y ago
      That tone is very much wanted. It's not a criticism. It's what they are. And that's perfectly fine, they don't all need to bring a PhD to the table. But as it stands, in the context of AI knowledge, Altman and Musk are hype men for OpenAI. Yes, they probably handle financials, or set targets. But they're not indispensable to the well functioning of an AI company.
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]
  - gkoberger 6y ago
    While maybe not as experienced in AI as some other people on the team, the people you mentioned have managed to secure $2bn+ in financing, brought together a group of incredible talented people in the field, and gave them a protected environment to build and experiment. Something like this requires a lot of different skills. There's probably zero companies out there where the CEO is the best engineer at the company; it requires different skills. I'll concede Musk is more of a figurehead (he's been gone for years), but Sam and Greg are incredibly involved and don't deserve your criticism.
dang 6y ago
Ok, but please don't post even more things that are devoid of substance.