3 ms·
> the age of the codebase is normally inversely proportional to its code quality. What??? You are saying that simply because a code base is old, it is of poor
by TedDoesntTalk 6y ago
> the age of the codebase is normally inversely proportional to its code quality.
What??? You are saying that simply because a code base is old, it is of poor quality. There are numerous public examples contradicting this: Linux, many Apache projects such as httpd, etc.
I emphatically disagree and would like to know why you think that.
- ratww 6y agoI said "normally". I don't think anyone considers Linux or httpd "old tech", neither they are "legacy software" that experienced developers are running away from. C might be old as a language, but there are still modern things being built with it. I also said that the issue is not the age itself or the tech stack.
- TedDoesntTalk 6y agoYou didn't use the word legacy in your post. You used the word old. Quite different. Something can be old and still maintained (httpd, etc).