4 ms·
Humans don't need a prompt to do this.
by TulliusCicero 6y ago
Humans don't need a prompt to do this.
- tech-historian 6y agoTrue. Maybe the human corollary to this is sarcasm. Lots of people fail to pick up on sarcasm in online discussion, hence the /s at the end of a post. And for that matter, natural language parsers really struggle at extracting real meaning from sarcastic texts too.
- lukevp 6y agoChildren often answer questions nonsensically. They are prompted over years to be serious and answer questions correctly.
- riffraff 6y agoI am not sure that's the same. Children answer nonsensically to normal questions, but if you ask a nonsensical question they are more likely to go "uh?" than to answer with logically built follow-up nonsense.
- TulliusCicero 6y agoYes, they are trained over time, just as this model has been.
- dafoex 6y agoWhat would the ethics be of using children in Turing tests? If you asked a human child to answer Turing test questions, would the judges think of them as a computer?
- Sharlin 6y agoHumans have much more context at their perusal than a simple prompt.
- wongarsu 6y agoThat depends on context. Nobody would answer "this question makes no sense" in an exam, instead most people assume they lack knowledge of what's being referenced. Even humans have to expect the possibility of nonsensical questions
- baddox 6y agoHumans don’t need AC power to operate either, but presumably these aren’t the kind of differences we’re interested in.
- SomewhatLikely 6y agoIt depends whether you think the other party would prefer for you to play along or call them out on their BS. Between friends we generally prefer the latter.