This is an interesting example of a pseudo-research article. It indeed looks like it's using scientific approach to an important problem, but the method is ques

This is an interesting example of a pseudo-research article. It indeed looks like it's using scientific approach to an important problem, but the method is questionable: - why did the authors pick 2,000 feet and 4,000 feet as thresholds? They refer to another article, but that article doesn't shed much light onto the problem as well - why does the research cover the range of 1996-2006? - the article looks at the low-income housing project built in 1996-2006. What's about the projects built before that? - what was located on the site before the project was built?