4 ms·
An argument could be made that IM, while written in form, is actually oral communication due to its characteristics. In fact, many linguicist consider IM and te
by DrJokepu 16y ago
An argument could be made that IM, while written in form, is actually oral communication due to its characteristics. In fact, many linguicist consider IM and texts as verbal communication.
- slapshot 16y ago> many linguicist consider IM and texts as verbal communication All linguists consider IM and texts as verbal communication{1}. The same for books, magazines, and websites: the word "verbal" generally just means "using words." Non-verbal would mean communicating without using words--such as pointing your finger, taking an item from the shelf, or giving a suggestive look. You really mean "oral" versus "written." It's not just pedantry; in cases like this the difference between "verbal" and "oral" is part of what is at stake. And for any startup, it's important to understand the legal language in agreements you make. The term "verbal agreement" has become so abused by the media, but it still makes a difference among lawyers (who might one day control the fate of that contract you signed). {1} A smiley-face in a text or IM is borderline, but I assume you mean something like "NO LIMIT!" from OP.
- mikeklaas 16y agoOne of the accepted meanings of "verbal" is "spoken, rather than written" [1]. [1] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/verbal http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/verbal
- ThomPete 16y agoActually in some countries an oral agreement is as binding as a written.