3 ms·

If someone has a fuzzy logic that definitively answers questions such as "what is the boundary between an individual and a system?" then he or she did the same

If someone has a fuzzy logic that definitively answers questions such as "what is the boundary between an individual and a system?" then he or she did the same thing Newton and Leibniz did with Xeno's paradoxes, and he or she would go down in history as both the greatest philosopher and a mathematician equal to Leibniz. But that doesn't happen to these guys and gals who work on fuzzy logic, does it?

sago 6y ago
> If someone has a fuzzy logic that definitively answers questions such as "what is the boundary between an individual and a system?" Ah, I see. That was our disconnect. That's the opposite of the idea. The logic is just to abandon a discrete boundary (physics does this in many cases). I think my use of 'fuzzy' might have sparked a different debate. Not one I find convincing (if Science then Philosophy, not Philosophy ∴ not Science ? um...) but I don't much rate 'fuzzy logic' for mathematical reasons. That's another rabbit hole! Thanks for clarifying.