> So basically like DNA? Sigh. When DNA becomes human, it doesn't have a-priori access to all the world's knowledge and yet it still develops intelligence wit

> So basically like DNA? Sigh. When DNA becomes human, it doesn't have a-priori access to all the world's knowledge and yet it still develops intelligence without it. And that little DNA machine learns and grows over time. When thousands of scientists and billions of human artifacts and 1000X more compute are put into the philosophical successor of GPT-3, it won't be as impressive as what happens when a 2 year old becomes a 3 year old. (It will probably make GPT-4 even less impressive than GPT-3, because the inputs vis-a-vis outputs will be even that much more removed from what humans already do.)