3 ms·
I'm not a very good test case. I briefly skimmed (not expecting very much from a Bitcoin-themed article), read the end, and only then read more carefully. So my
by yyyk 6y ago
I'm not a very good test case. I briefly skimmed (not expecting very much from a Bitcoin-themed article), read the end, and only then read more carefully. So my first read was brief and biased, and my second was very biased.
That said, the content of the computer-generated parts doesn't make much sense even for a Bitcoin-influenced article (what would be the point of paraphrasing your previous post in a forum on a regular basis, and how does this not get one very quickly banned?), but the grammar is far far better than previous attempts - it reads like Simple English wiki.
- woko 6y ago> I briefly skimmed (not expecting very much from a Bitcoin-themed article), read the end, and only then read more carefully. It sounds to me like you must be an academic, or someone with good habits for being efficient at reading articles.
- Reimersholme 6y agoI do think the starting paragraphs with background information and contextualization is really impressive. I can definitely see for example Wikipedia injecting a knowledge graph and having a system like this output full articles in X languages automatically in the near future.