3 ms·
It's ironic that the artist used a video camera (a rather privacy-invading tool) to detect where the subject is, in order to move the curtain (to shield privacy
by nayuki 6y ago
It's ironic that the artist used a video camera (a rather privacy-invading tool) to detect where the subject is, in order to move the curtain (to shield privacy). A more honest implementation could have used low-resolution ultrasonic proximity sensors or something like that.
- kazagistar 6y agoYeah, that's the intent of the artwork.
- phyzome 6y agoIt's his little piece of privacy, not yours.
- monkpit 6y agoIs the artwork the curtains, or the people’s reactions to it? I’m sure the cctv is perfectly legal wherever this is located and people don’t have expectation of privacy while walking down a city street.