I'm sorry you had to go through this. I'm not offended, I'm pointing out how the situation differs. If doctors gives inaccurate information, it's an important

I'm sorry you had to go through this. I'm not offended, I'm pointing out how the situation differs. If doctors gives inaccurate information, it's an important problem that needs to be discussed. > the doctors said his treatment was curative not palliative In the present case, it seems like it was not the case: "At the time, Sean’s doctors told him he had at least a 50% chance of long-term survival if he underwent chemotherapy", while the alternative medicines gave false information: "Sean also relied on "thermographic scans" - heat images of the body" or "I’d use words like, 'oh no it’s the Herxheimer’s reaction'". It seems to me like we are preaching for the same thing, which is to give the correct information to the patient and let him decide.