3 ms·
It would help a lot if popular alternative treatments were studied thoroughly (including testing on big numbers of human volunteers - every person who chooses t
by qwerty456127 6y ago
It would help a lot if popular alternative treatments were studied thoroughly (including testing on big numbers of human volunteers - every person who chooses to exercise their right to deny conventional treatment should be convinced to contribute by letting scientists observe him while he is treated alternatively) with intention to identify and dissect every humble positive effect they might cause in any particular kind of patients.
A statement like "there is no credible evidence that thing helps" really can't convince an alternative treatment enthusiast to give his idea up. "Obiviously" there is no evidence because nobody no scientist for it.
We need to be able to tell them honestly: "we have tried hard, hundreds different people were studied thoroughly for this particular treatment, it really doesn't help or only helps slightly a particular kind of patients you don't fit, please go and get treated the way proven efficient".
- insickness 6y agoThe problem is that there are an infinite number of 'alternative' treatments to any illness. How many of these should be taken seriously and tested? Typically, if enough people take an alternative seriously, someone eventually tests it.
- em-bee 6y agoall of them? you are not testing the treatment, you are testing the development of the cancer in the patient, regardless of which treatment they get. simply test everyone diagnosed with cancer on a regular basis just like they get tested when they do the recommended treatment. in other words, if someone refuses the treatment, don't let them refuse the tests as well.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]