4 ms·
It might be a stupid question but, aside from the obvious benefits of saving bandwidth by omitting useless noise in transport, doesn't it make sense to employ t
by ACAVJW4H 6y ago
It might be a stupid question but, aside from the obvious benefits of saving bandwidth by omitting useless noise in transport, doesn't it make sense to employ these technologies server-side? One could maybe make Jitsi or BigBlueButton use similar technologies? It would make it much more ubiquitous, better platform support (would work on mobile or low CPU/GPU clients) and also save on system provisioning as maybe the neural net could be utilized better by running for different audio sources concurrently
- bufferoverflow 6y agoAs a system owner, it makes financial sense to do it on the client. Imagine you're managing Zoom. You will need tens of thousands of GPUs running 24/7 just for noise suppression.
- kaielvin 6y agoI believe Discords does a lot of noise filtering and cutting-off. I suspect it is server-side (given that they have a web app), but I am not certain.
- spacechild1 6y agoI know that Zoom does noise reduction and echo cancellation by default, but I don't know if they do it client-side or server-side (for peer-to-peer calls it has to be client-side, obviously)