2 ms·
Yes, but it’s only more efficient than testing everybody if you are unlikely to get a positive result. So, in places where covid is not widely spreading.
by lps41 6y ago
Yes, but it’s only more efficient than testing everybody if you are unlikely to get a positive result. So, in places where covid is not widely spreading.
- lern_too_spel 6y agoThe method described in the article isn't a traditional pooled test. Each sample is marked, and it tests and reports on all samples at once.