5 ms·

That's kind of a cynical take. I parsed that statement as saying: > did the attackers see any of my private information? For the vast majority of people [who w

• sudosysgen 6y ago
  There is no indication that the accounts whose data was accessed were the accounts which tweeted the crypto scam. Therefore, I'm not sure that's a straightforward explanation.
  • andrewxdiamond 6y ago
    They say the attackers reset passwords on the accounts. Any competent engineering team would have a complete list of those events in logs
    • bhaak 6y ago
      You can't assume competence after such an hack. Before this has happened, you would have assumed that Twitter employees wouldn't fall for social engineering on this scale. I wonder especially how they could have bypassed their 2FA. Unless they specifically tell you something, you can't assume it to be the case.
• summitsummit 6y ago
  > That's kind of a cynical take. Disagree. The statement could be parsed more applicably as saying: > The most important question for people who use Twitter is likely — did the attackers see any of my private information? For the vast majority of people [who use Twitter], we believe the answer is, no.