3 ms·
The person he/she/they is responding to may not have originated the thought, but the quote this poster is responding to is very clear from context. It reads as
by matthewdgreen 6y ago
The person he/she/they is responding to may not have originated the thought, but the quote this poster is responding to is very clear from context. It reads as follows:
“The authors feel that, in light of this preponderance of circumstantial evidence, the hypothesis that the biogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 involved human intervention should be seen as the leading (i.e. most likely) explanation.”
- bitcurious 6y agoWhich is not an accusation of research done in bad faith. The linked paper referenced 4 others as evidence. It doesn't say that those 4 were somehow done for evil - just that they were done.