“ doesn’t actually make any claims about whether the virus was natural or man-made in its current form.” Huh? The paper claims that the preponderance of eviden

“ doesn’t actually make any claims about whether the virus was natural or man-made in its current form.” Huh? The paper claims that the preponderance of evidence supports a theory that the virus is the product of a sequence of laboratory manipulations. I suppose this could hinge upon one’s definition of “man-made” but creating a chimera is man-made in my opinion.