> Management performance is, and always will be, mostly but not exclusively explained by "I was around in the right place at the right time to concentrate retur

> Management performance is, and always will be, mostly but not exclusively explained by "I was around in the right place at the right time to concentrate returns on capital in my hands." I agree with this statement. [1] seems to agree with it as well, finding no correlation between CEO performance and quality of MBA program or past successes as CEO. Obviously those aren't the only two factors to consider what makes a successful CEO, but it's what a lot of people in society think. [1] https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1db3jy3201d38/The-MBA-Myth-and-the-Cult-of-the-CEO https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1db3jy3201d38...