4 ms·

If you would read the second link I posted carefully you would find out that the investigations started in November, field investigations went from the 6th of J

If you would read the second link I posted carefully you would find out that the investigations started in November, field investigations went from the 6th of January to the 13th. If there was an activity of large groups of drones flying in grid patterns - let alone ones with a 6 feet wing span - these would have been easy to confirm. Add to this that there is no video or photographic evidence of any of these activities. Of 90 reports in a couple of months none of the witnesses had a phone on them to shoot anything that's not a single light in the sky? I think that this is a text book example of social media fueled collective hysteria at its best. Specifically your points 1, 2 and 3 are signs of the phenomenon - about your 4th point: even more reason to expect any form of firm evidence.

matthewdgreen 6y ago
I’ve tried to photograph large planes and Navy dirigibles in the sky. Every picture, even the ones that were of vehicles just a few hundred feet above me (where I can hear the engines) turned out to look like specks unless I digitally blew it up. And this is daytime. At night even close up objects just produce a bright speck, or a collection of specks. Eg: https://twitter.com/justin_fenton/status/385040854920204288?s=21 https://twitter.com/justin_fenton/status/385040854920204288?... Reality: https://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2013/09/27/eye-in-the-sky-navy-research-blimp-hovering-over-charm-city/ https://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2013/09/27/eye-in-the-sky-nav...