4 ms·
It's hardly fair to look back with 30 years of hindsight and say that BASIC was more important to a company than SoftCard. Obviously, we know that now, but that
by hvs 16y ago
It's hardly fair to look back with 30 years of hindsight and say that BASIC was more important to a company than SoftCard. Obviously, we know that now, but that doesn't speak to their specific situation.
- rbanffy 16y agoIIRC, Paul Allen wrote most of Microsoft's original BASIC interpreter... And the emulator they used to develop it.
- c2 16y agoAccording to Wikipedia, you recall wrong. Gates wrote the interpreter and Allen wrote the emulator: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft#History http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft#History
- rbanffy 16y agoThanks for the correction. I really had the impression Allen had more to do with the BASIC interpreter...
- gwern 16y agoThe _Vanity Fair_ excerpts have Allen writing the emulator, all the other development tools, the loader, and then he wrote 25% of the interpreter itself: http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2011/05/paul-allen-201105?currentPage=3 http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2011/05/paul-all...
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- c2 16y agoBASIC was the foundation of the company, by 1980 SoftCard was one project of many. I don't discount the importance of SoftCard, it was actually key in the development of the relationship between IBM and Microsoft in the 80s, but even more key was the building of the relationship itself, which was largely driven by Gates. Allen's attitude at the time reminds me of software developer coworkers who over emphasis the contributions that software development makes. I can understand Gates' reaction - Gates' job was not any easier and certainly not any less important, so why redistribute shares?
- yannickmahe 16y agoThe wikipedia article on the softcard doesn't even mention Allen : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softcard http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softcard Is that a mistake?