> 10 hours ... is quite reasonable. How many good candidates have been willing to do it? That's the fact that matters, not an argument about what people "shou

> 10 hours ... is quite reasonable. How many good candidates have been willing to do it? That's the fact that matters, not an argument about what people "should" do. > If they're considering 4 offers and can't spend 10 hrs on each, then why on earth not? Suppose that I'm considering two offers. One wants 10 hours and the other doesn't. Are you seriously suggesting that I shouldn't take that into account? The answer to "why not" is "because even if getting a job is my only priority, paying extra for a chance at given job isn't".