The paper is definitely accessible, but that doesn't mean you don't have to have a solid understanding of math to do this stuff behind the hood. They gloss over

The paper is definitely accessible, but that doesn't mean you don't have to have a solid understanding of math to do this stuff behind the hood. They gloss over stuff like "focal loss" plus this is just an update on some small tweaks they've made, so obviously wouldn't be super math heavy. All in all, not a great paper to prove your point imo.