Yeah, this is what makes no sense to me. In a f2f transaction, I exchange money for goods. In a virtual transaction, it creates a fundamental asymmetry if the m

Yeah, this is what makes no sense to me. In a f2f transaction, I exchange money for goods. In a virtual transaction, it creates a fundamental asymmetry if the money transfer can't be reversed, since you have no way of verifying the other part of the transaction, i.e., that the goods were actually shipped. The bitcoin proponents make a big deal that transactions can't be reversed. But if you continue reading the FAQ, they also make a big deal about the fact that you shouldn't deal with people you don't trust and that it's your responsibility. I'm sorry, but that doesn't make sense to me. If transactions were only done between trusted parties, there wouldn't be a need for chargebacks either. You want to put the responsibility entirely on the customer, who has no practical ability to judge trustworthiness of an online retailer. An escrow service doesn't make sense either. Then I have to trust that service. Maybe if some well-known non-bitcoin entity offered such a service, I would be inclined to trust it. But for now, it doesn't seem to me that any of the bitcoin entities have enough to lose to convince me that they're not front ends for scamming operations. I mean, Bernard Madoff and Enron were scams, how in the world could I judge that these operations aren't? It's true I don't have much trust in the government to go find my money when my wallet's picked out of my pocket. But I do have some trust in that if a store front just took customers' money without giving anything back, they would be shut down pretty soon. No, what's needed is a scheme which not only ensures the currency transaction, but the entire transaction. It seems that, at least for digital goods, one should be able to design a system where the good is encrypted, and the use of your key to decrypt it simultaneously effects the currency transaction. Still doesn't ensure the content is what they said it would be, though...