3 ms·
Super cool, thanks for this! Now regarding the results: Are there any actual usecases where one would choose Angular over some other library? From what i’ve s
by asutekku 6y ago
Super cool, thanks for this!
Now regarding the results: Are there any actual usecases where one would choose Angular over some other library?
From what i’ve seen from before and now this, i am not aware of a single reason why would anyone choose to use it, if they are not constrained by legacy codebase or if there are no stubborn developers who swear by it.
- Kuinox 6y agoVue is great to make small webapp. Also wikipedia chose Vue to remake their UI IIRC. React is even simpler, but I really hate it for technical reasons.
- EGreg 6y agoWe are working to document Q.js out of our entire platform becauss it can be used to make much simpler to understand web components, which work seamlessly with SPA pages, events and more: https://qbix.com/platform/guide/tools https://qbix.com/platform/guide/tools https://github.com/Qbix/Platform https://github.com/Qbix/Platform
- yitianjian 6y ago1) These are benchmarks just using a counter - a lot of libraries perform really well using these minimal POCs but fail complete in real world applications (whether due to library performance, missing features, etc.) 2) This is sticking Angular inside a WebComponent with the minimal amount to make a counter - but you wouldn't take a heavy library to make a counter. Imagine React + Redux + Redux-Observables + StyledComponents just to make a counter. It's like hitting a nail with a ICBM.