There's no contention that the overall data is bad. The discovery was that some specific labs had dropped their negative numbers, presumably accidentally. Stu

There's no contention that the overall data is bad. The discovery was that some specific labs had dropped their negative numbers, presumably accidentally. Stuff happens, there's a pandemic, labs are crushed. We're never going to get good data. There's no "goalseeking" going on here. If you think the numbers are clearly wrong, what's your source on better ones, or what's your analysis showing what the proper infection rate is among tested children?