>>What theory of ethics/justice are you invoking Mainly Zero-Aggression principle, under which the only ethical use of force is for defense of either yourself

>>What theory of ethics/justice are you invoking Mainly Zero-Aggression principle, under which the only ethical use of force is for defense of either yourself or others, and only to the extent eliminate the aggressive force being applied. >>If a billionaire is found guilty of pedophilia, and offers to build for himself a lifetime "prison" that is really a 5-star resort, should he be allowed to do so? That is a strawman and a red herring all in one. No a person should not be allowed to build their own guided cage, however the prison s/he is sent to should be humane, where s/he would not be physically abused by other inmates or guards, not be subjected to physical or psychological abuse, should be provided basic nutrition, and health care, etc This can not be said to be true for the US prison system today Further the system I advocate for would provide for massive amounts of restitution for the victim(s) of this billionaire, unlike the system of today which holds the criminal has a "debt to society" but not necessarily their victims where any restitution would be secondary to the retribution offered to society as "payment" for this debt I advocate for victim restitution being the primary goal, and hold that society is owed nothing in the equation. This once a person is isolated from society and can not harm anyone, continued abuse or violence is unethical, "punishment" in captivity is unethical.