4 ms·
It does claim, however, removing 5G waves. Which if true, would fall under radar jamming in FCC and be highly illegal. $50k fine. (Unless it is passive - alumi
by AstralStorm 6y ago
It does claim, however, removing 5G waves. Which if true, would fall under radar jamming in FCC and be highly illegal. $50k fine.
(Unless it is passive - aluminum foil or a mesh cage, which is perfectly legal.)
Therefore it's false advertising.
- SahAssar 6y agoDoes it? All I can see on their site that implies blocking/jamming is "balance and harmonisation of the harmful effects of imbalanced electric radiation", which seems vague and pseudo-science-y enough to not break any laws.
- AstralStorm 6y agoBut does it do that? If I put the device near test rats subject to really excess SAR, will it prevent them from being cooked?
- SahAssar 6y agoAre "balance and harmonisation" exact enough terms that you can disprove them? Can that sentence even be called a technical or medical claim considering how vague it is? Vitaminwater has some drink called "balance", would that fall under the same thing? They also have something called "revive" but I don't think you can call it illegal just because it won't revive people from death.
- AstralStorm 6y agoWell, it does claim a specific noxious agent it does something against. Much like you couldn't say something balances and harmonizes your body against cancer or say heavy metals when it does not do such a thing.
- SahAssar 6y agoIt says it does something about something. Neither "balance and harmonisation" or "imbalanced electric radiation" are precise enough terms to disprove I'd think. Then again, I'm in no way an expert on quack healing devices or RF engineering.