3 ms·
Having paid for newspapers and running an adblocker, you really can't compare the experience. An adblocker doesn't give you descriptive headlines, a sensible la
by tomjen3 6y ago
Having paid for newspapers and running an adblocker, you really can't compare the experience. An adblocker doesn't give you descriptive headlines, a sensible layout of articles or even content that is meant to give you a reasonable overview of the world.
I remember the Economists app, having layout with sensibly named articles in sections that are relevant (so I can skip the style section), and first paragraphs that layout the meat of the article so I could skim it. Very good for me, but terrible for "engagement".
I can subscribe to them, unfortunately because they also run dark-patterns: you can subscribe online, but have to call a number during British Business hours to unsubscribe (I sent an angry email to their support, but still).
- PaulDavisThe1st 6y agoI subscribe to the Santa Fe New Mexican (local rag), NYT and the Guardian. It's a small sample size, but they are all ad-free for me, sensibly layed out and a pleasure to read, using any of AdBlock+, AdNauseam or uBlock Origin (I've switched in this order as the earlier ones become ineffective against ... YouTube ads)
- Wolfenstein98k 6y agoIn the age of polarisation, you should definitely keep up with at least one right-of-centre outlet. National Review is still of high standards