I agree that Amp can go to hell, but I'm very unsympathetic to these particular complaints: > “The canonical page allows users to view and add comments, but th

I agree that Amp can go to hell, but I'm very unsympathetic to these particular complaints: > “The canonical page allows users to view and add comments, but the AMP article does not. This is often considered missing content by users.” > “The canonical URL allows users to share content directly to diverse social media platforms. This feature is missing on the AMP page.” > “The canonical page contains a media carousel that is missing or broken in the AMP version of the page.” As far as I'm concerned, all that stuff is trash. I use ublock origin cosmetic filters to remove all that crap on every news site I read.