4 ms·
Is anyone just using Git{Hub,Lab,Tea} issues and being fine with it? Is the absence of a Kanban board a deal breaker? Perhaps for management.
by mrslave 6y ago
Is anyone just using Git{Hub,Lab,Tea} issues and being fine with it?
Is the absence of a Kanban board a deal breaker? Perhaps for management.
- anix 6y agoGithub has Projects, which IMO does a pretty decent job.
- seneca 6y agoGitLab includes kanban boards, actually.
- closeparen 6y agoGit-adjacent issue trackers are communication tools for developers. JIRA is a surveillance and control mechanism for senior executives. It just depends on the size of your company.
- brazzy 6y ago> Git-adjacent issue trackers are communication tools for developers. So is JIRA. > JIRA is a surveillance and control mechanism for senior executives. Never saw it being used like that, though I see how it could be abused. > It just depends on the size of your company. The culture probably more than the size.
- eli 6y agoWe were fine with just using Github Issues... until we weren't. At a certain scale, it's too hard to sort and filter issues and since you can't add fields it was hard to capture all the issue metadata we wanted.
- axegon_ 6y agoLab enterprise, yeah. They are utterly useful in our case since we are working on a branch per issue model, which makes it extremely easy for tracking and code reviews.
- amoe_ 6y agoHow do you deal with projects that have multiple Git repositories associated with them, but need to have their issues tracked in a single place?
- shoo 6y agoyou can define github projects that source and display issues from github issue trackers across multiple github repos. this is certainly a feature of on-site deployments of github enterprise. i am not sure if it is offered as part of github.com's enterprise offering or to non enterprise users. but hey, this is the enterprise software thread.