> but we like pfSense for the router/firewall part. Thank you very much! > FreeBSD's wireless support has been horrible every time I've tried it compared to t

> but we like pfSense for the router/firewall part. Thank you very much! > FreeBSD's wireless support has been horrible every time I've tried it compared to the same hardware running a Linux-based platform. That’s why Netgate and the FreeBSD foundation are employing bz@ full-time to work on the 802.11 stack. FF for mostly intel client 802.11ac support, Netgate for the AP side, starting with Atheros, because Intel 802.11 parts are somewhat crippled here prior to 802.11ax. I know Adrian, and I like Adrian, but his mention of bz@‘s efforts seems dismissive to me.