> If 4chan had started out with a different seed group of contributors, it might well be a very, very different place. Hoping that's the case as I'm working on

> If 4chan had started out with a different seed group of contributors, it might well be a very, very different place. Hoping that's the case as I'm working on a new chat-based discussion site with no voting and goal of open, rigorous, reverent discussions (sqwok.im). I think there's merit in using signals like activity and others to determine relevance, and agree that part of the problem with 4chan is simply the ethos set in the beginning.