I think you quoted the entirety of the article that addresses national security... The other 95% of the article was recap of what every article says about the

I think you quoted the entirety of the article that addresses national security... The other 95% of the article was recap of what every article says about the incident, or otherwise not related to national security... I was excited to read any possible national security implications, perhaps things I wasn't even thinking of... And I was disappointed that the 2 sentences you posted, buried in the tail of a rather long article, were the justification for the headline "profound national security implications"... I at least hypothesized potential national security risks, instead of making vague national security claims... The article is using those 2-3 sentences to give a scarier headline to drive clicks, when it's not much better than the other stories already on here.