4 ms·
As a counter-argument, maybe the thing people are willing to pay for is the insights of a single individual (like https://www.gwern.net/ https://www.gwern.net/
by NegatioN 6y ago
As a counter-argument, maybe the thing people are willing to pay for is the insights of a single individual (like https://www.gwern.net/ https://www.gwern.net/ which makes a decent chunk of money from patreon), not the entire organization (such as a news paper?)
There's always going to be people who're interested in insightful, well researched articles and opinions. Isn't a part of the problem connecting these people, to the actual individuals doing posting in a more transparent way than a news-paper?
Having this as the default would pose problems of it's own, and make some of the deeper journalism requiring months/years to complete more difficult though.
- searchableguy 6y agoGwern doesn't earn much on patreon for his work. It's also totally different than most journalists who push out stories left and right on topics they have layman understanding of. The quality and depth of work is significantly higher. I would pay for news reporting from gwern than random journalist.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]