I am not resorting to pathos. I am rationally pointing out that _blockcipher_'s solution is to unnecessarily kill a bunch (easily millions) of people. That is

I am not resorting to pathos. I am rationally pointing out that _blockcipher_'s solution is to unnecessarily kill a bunch (easily millions) of people. That is a murderous agenda. There is no exaggeration. Just facts. Your attempts to paint me as the irrational pathos-ridden one with a thesis built on a foundation of sand and paper-ed over with non-sequitor citations in this conversation are transparent. I don't need any additional support when your own sources are telling you that it is highly unlikely that herd immunity kicks in at 20%. As an actual scientist, I can tell you that when someone says " a 20 percent threshold is unlikely, but not impossible", it means exactly what it says. Impossible is a very high bar (essentially unobtainable in biology), and when you invoke it you mean that whatever possibility there is is very very very very low.