4 ms·
That "opportunity" is not worth having no company-provided health insurance, nor is it worth paying both halves of the FICA tax, except for the desperate.
by ootachi 16y ago
That "opportunity" is not worth having no company-provided health insurance, nor is it worth paying both halves of the FICA tax, except for the desperate.
- staunch 16y agoBecause it's impossible to pay someone at a higher hourly rate than they would be paid as a full-time employee?
- tptacek 16y agoIt's not the easiest thing in the world to explain, no, which is why I bet most people who do the temp-to-perm thing don't bother, and just pay the contractor according to their yearly salary. After all, if they don't know enough not to take the term-to-perm offer, why complicate things? ;)
- staunch 16y agoThat may be. I have no interest in what other companies do, really. I'm happy to pay higher hourly during the contract to compensate for the lack of benefits. I'm happy to pay a (naive) employee more than they asked for because I know what the position is worth and have no interest in tricking them. This isn't generosity, it's just good long-term business IMHO.
- elai 16y agoHow about a W-2 contractor with benefits?