4 ms·
I think similarly to planes and automobiles, people over-value emotional, anecdotal evidence over scientific, verifiable evidence by a large margin when it come
by morrow 16y ago
I think similarly to planes and automobiles, people over-value emotional, anecdotal evidence over scientific, verifiable evidence by a large margin when it comes to unfamiliar events. As much as you are more likely to die on the way to the airport, it's easier to visualize dying horrifically in a plane crash than in the car, as one is much rarer and harder to understand than one which you ride in every day without issue.
I think the solution to this could be to incentivize tolerance of nuclear power (maybe tax breaks to live within N miles of one), and educate those unaware of the difference, until it becomes familiar to people.
- c1sc0 16y agoThis. Policies invented to cater to the random irrational fears of the public are going to do us in.
- semanticist 16y agoI suspect that if you paid people to live near a nuclear power station it would produce the opposite effect to the one you're hoping for. After all, if nuclear power was so safe, why do they have to pay people to live near the station? (Etc, etc.)