6 ms·
This was long overdue. Let's hope they won't come up with a new name just as they did last time when Safe Harbour was abolished. This thing was an insult to E
by Krasnol 6y ago
This was long overdue.
Let's hope they won't come up with a new name just as they did last time when Safe Harbour was abolished.
This thing was an insult to EU privacy laws.
- killerpopiller 6y agoafter "Safe-Harbor"and it's successor "EU-US Privacy-Shield" I suggest.. the "Trust-PACT" P - privacy A - acknowledged C - confidentiality T - treaty It's not only an insult of EU data protection laws and the EU basic rights charta. Not only are the big US cloud providers evading taxes and stiffling competition in the EU, they are also instrumental to US hegemonial ambitions. All your data (and taxes) belongs to us. That's whats going on. I wonder how long the standard contractual clauses will hold, I don't see how they are doing better.
- di4na 6y agoThis judgement also validated SCC. Basically they are ok because they are underpinned by "the receiver country need to have proper privacy protections". So the SCC is legit. You just can't use it with the US.