> > In any case the fault is most certainly not merely marketing, it's a fundamental design flaw. > I was actually referring to the ruling. The court did not t

> > In any case the fault is most certainly not merely marketing, it's a fundamental design flaw. > I was actually referring to the ruling. The court did not take issue with the autopilot system, just with the way it's marketed. I meant the parent post you were replying to, i.e. what I think MereInterest meant when he said "If there is a human in the control loop, then it needs to take into account human limitations", to which you replied "I am honestly not sure how to interpret your comment but I'll try to respond. The fault is not with the AP." I did not mean to imply you thought it was a fundamental design flaw - sorry!