3 ms·
It's telling that you can't point out one specific example; that you have to make one up. If it was protecting you, or others, it seems it would be easy (or at
by sillysaurusx 6y ago
It's telling that you can't point out one specific example; that you have to make one up.
If it was protecting you, or others, it seems it would be easy (or at least possible) to rattle off several examples.
- sirmarksalot 6y agoGP chose green-eyed people in order to be inoffensive. It doesn't take much imagination to realize who they're really talking about.
- sillysaurusx 6y agoGP is also defending a weapon. I've formerly been a gun enthusiast. I could link to specific articles showing their effectiveness in preventing home invasions. Similarly, this is a "social gun" – why is it effective? Who is it protecting? I think the metaphor makes it comfortable to believe that it must be protecting someone, when in reality the green-eyed people might not exist.
- sirmarksalot 6y agoSo you're arguing that Jews, Blacks, and LGBT don't exist?