3 ms·
> purported / alleged. The claims of this have been debunked. Isn't this entire article about how the courts in Germany determined that it is, in fact, false a
by MereInterest 6y ago
> purported / alleged. The claims of this have been debunked.
Isn't this entire article about how the courts in Germany determined that it is, in fact, false advertising?
- natch 6y agoThat’s your interpretation of the article’s interpretation of the court’s interpretation I guess. Making all the foregoing my interpretation of your interpretation. Having read the Tesla website myself and understood its claims, they are not false. I believe the court was concerned that it was theoretically possible that some people might get confused. Or to put it in a harsh (to Tesla) way, the court feared some consumers could be misled (I would add, misled only due to the consumer’s own failure to read and listen to the information offered by Tesla with several different opportunities in varied and timely settings). So with this in mind, the court took action based on those fears. Conclusions beyond that are not warranted.
- FireBeyond 6y ago> Having read the Tesla website myself and understood its claims, they are not false. "The driver is only present for legal reasons". Really? That's a direct quote from Tesla, a claim. I don't think it at all stands on itself.