3 ms·
I believe the line is that you could care less, but that would take effort and you can't be bothered. :D If you allow for the possibility of negative values f
by Stormbringer 16y ago
I believe the line is that you could care less, but that would take effort and you can't be bothered. :D
If you allow for the possibility of negative values for caring it is always possible to care less, it is just that there are diminishing marginal returns for that much anti-utility. :D
- ghurlman 16y agoAlas, while caring can continue into infinity, zero is indeed the lower bound. See also: http://www.incompetech.com/Images/caring.png http://www.incompetech.com/Images/caring.png
- Stormbringer 16y agoWhat about imaginary values of caring? Complex numbers need lovin' too! :D
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]