5 ms·

Would this be killed by security requirements? My company allows email on my Android only if I install MS Intune which made me choose a longer passcode and does

Would this be killed by security requirements? My company allows email on my Android only if I install MS Intune which made me choose a longer passcode and doesnt allow unlocked screen while charging. Banking apps prevent rooted phones. Will major apps boycott this platform?

Shared404 6y ago
It's not android. I wouldn't expect major apps on this at all, at least not any time soon.
- ralls_ebfe 6y ago
  GloDroid may work: https://github.com/GloDroid/glodroid_manifest https://github.com/GloDroid/glodroid_manifest
  - djeiasbsbo 6y ago
    I have an android phone with a custom UBPorts build maintained by an XDA forums member. It runs many android apps very well within anbox. I have tested many apps from F-Droid with success. Even the android buttons (recents, go back) work which is very convenient in android apps. Right now the performance is better than on my pinephone but there are also some issues, like Libertine not working correctly. The main issue with anbox right now is that video/audio playback does not work. Apps like NewPipe and AntennaPod run fine except that no playback is possible (results in blackscreen). Dual booting a linux distribution with something like glodroid seems like a promising solution!
    - atupis 6y ago
      Does Whatsapp work through anbox?
      - djeiasbsbo 6y ago
        I will have to try that out... wish I had a spare phone number.
megous 6y ago
My guess is that major apps will simply ignore Linux phones, until they get noticeable adoption. The web is the only saving grace for any of the upstart mobile devices and new operating system projects, when it comes to compatibility with incumbent/major apps. That's also why open protocols/APIs/formats, data portability, are important. So that people who care can write an independent clients. One of the banks I use has an open, docummented JSON API for end users (as a basic feature of the regular bank account, that everyone gets access to by default). I can easily write a bank app for that, to be able to do some basic account overview and wire transfer payments. It's not a locked down platform, so if security means that everything has to be signed/verified/locked down and unmodifiable by the user, then it will not pass.
- mondoshawan 6y ago
  Which bank is this? I've been looking for one that exposes an API for years.
  - tpxl 6y ago
    In theory there is EU regulation so all EU banks should expose this. I'm not sure where it went in practice though.
    - Freak_NL 6y ago
      I think that (PSD2) only applies to having an API that allows users to grant access to their account to third party apps. Actually using that API yourself seems impossible, as banks want only vetted third parties to actually use the API. It means you get the freedom to choose a different pre-approved proprietary app to access your bank account (which will probably make its money from selling a nicely detailed advertising profile based on your transactions), not the freedom to interface with your bank with an open API. Also, because of the strong authentication requirement from PSD2 (amongst others), you won't get to do banking in an app except on an Android or IOS smartphone. Add to this the ongoing drive from banks and governments alike to push authentication even on a normal computer to smartphones (i.e., you use their proprietary app on an Android/IOS smartphone to authenticate when you access them via a web browser on a normal computer), and the picture becomes really bleak for any alternative smartphone OS. The current trend, at least seen from the Netherlands, is: you submit to an Android or IOS smartphone, and you get to do things like banking or accessing your digital healthcare dossier online. If you don't, then you are classified as digitally illiterate, and are nudged towards having people near you assume those tasks in your name by delegation — basically the strategy for elderly or the mentally incapable. The third option, authentication using discrete hardware such as card readers (currently an option for many banks) or something like WebAuthn is something banks would really like to get rid of because of the cost of maintaining multiple authentication methods, and hey, everybody owns an Android/IOS smartphone anyway, so why not .. ?

Shared404 6y ago

It's not android. I wouldn't expect major apps on this at all, at least not any time soon.

ralls_ebfe 6y ago
GloDroid may work: https://github.com/GloDroid/glodroid_manifest https://github.com/GloDroid/glodroid_manifest
- djeiasbsbo 6y ago
  I have an android phone with a custom UBPorts build maintained by an XDA forums member. It runs many android apps very well within anbox. I have tested many apps from F-Droid with success. Even the android buttons (recents, go back) work which is very convenient in android apps. Right now the performance is better than on my pinephone but there are also some issues, like Libertine not working correctly. The main issue with anbox right now is that video/audio playback does not work. Apps like NewPipe and AntennaPod run fine except that no playback is possible (results in blackscreen). Dual booting a linux distribution with something like glodroid seems like a promising solution!
  - atupis 6y ago
    Does Whatsapp work through anbox?
    - djeiasbsbo 6y ago
      I will have to try that out... wish I had a spare phone number.

megous 6y ago

My guess is that major apps will simply ignore Linux phones, until they get noticeable adoption. The web is the only saving grace for any of the upstart mobile devices and new operating system projects, when it comes to compatibility with incumbent/major apps. That's also why open protocols/APIs/formats, data portability, are important. So that people who care can write an independent clients. One of the banks I use has an open, docummented JSON API for end users (as a basic feature of the regular bank account, that everyone gets access to by default). I can easily write a bank app for that, to be able to do some basic account overview and wire transfer payments. It's not a locked down platform, so if security means that everything has to be signed/verified/locked down and unmodifiable by the user, then it will not pass.

mondoshawan 6y ago
Which bank is this? I've been looking for one that exposes an API for years.
- tpxl 6y ago
  In theory there is EU regulation so all EU banks should expose this. I'm not sure where it went in practice though.
  - Freak_NL 6y ago
    I think that (PSD2) only applies to having an API that allows users to grant access to their account to third party apps. Actually using that API yourself seems impossible, as banks want only vetted third parties to actually use the API. It means you get the freedom to choose a different pre-approved proprietary app to access your bank account (which will probably make its money from selling a nicely detailed advertising profile based on your transactions), not the freedom to interface with your bank with an open API. Also, because of the strong authentication requirement from PSD2 (amongst others), you won't get to do banking in an app except on an Android or IOS smartphone. Add to this the ongoing drive from banks and governments alike to push authentication even on a normal computer to smartphones (i.e., you use their proprietary app on an Android/IOS smartphone to authenticate when you access them via a web browser on a normal computer), and the picture becomes really bleak for any alternative smartphone OS. The current trend, at least seen from the Netherlands, is: you submit to an Android or IOS smartphone, and you get to do things like banking or accessing your digital healthcare dossier online. If you don't, then you are classified as digitally illiterate, and are nudged towards having people near you assume those tasks in your name by delegation — basically the strategy for elderly or the mentally incapable. The third option, authentication using discrete hardware such as card readers (currently an option for many banks) or something like WebAuthn is something banks would really like to get rid of because of the cost of maintaining multiple authentication methods, and hey, everybody owns an Android/IOS smartphone anyway, so why not .. ?