1. I repeated an argument made in the article itself. That cannot be considered flamebait. 2. I've always expressed strong opinions in my posts. Sometimes this

1. I repeated an argument made in the article itself. That cannot be considered flamebait. 2. I've always expressed strong opinions in my posts. Sometimes this results in multiple upvotes, sometimes in multiple downvotes. 3. About being "unsubstantive" - I underscored the main concept/rationale for Core Linux, and linked to its Wikipedia page. You could argue that it's not substantive _enough_, but when you phrase it this way it's as though you merely dislike the fact that I repeated the inflammatory term from the article.