5 ms·
At my company we interviewed two people. Both did fairly poorly in different ways. One we hired because he was a referral and came highly recommended despite a
by Osiris 6y ago
At my company we interviewed two people. Both did fairly poorly in different ways. One we hired because he was a referral and came highly recommended despite a not great interview. He's been great.
The second guy was rejected but later hired as a contractor and he's worked out well as well and now we're looking at offering him a full-time position.
My conclusion is that our interview process isn't good at determining if a candidate would be a good employee.
My preference would be to hire someone as a contractor and give them a project then use that to determine their quality and fit. Unfortunately, HR tells me that's not feasible for reasons I don't understand.
- redisman 6y ago> HR tells me that's not feasible for reasons I don't understand You are asking them to do some work.
- tonyedgecombe 6y agoMy preference would be to hire someone as a contractor When I was contracting it was common to be offered a job at the end of the contract. I always turned it down because I liked being a contractor. From talking to my peers at the time this was common. If someone didn't want to be a contractor then they wouldn't accept your offer in the first place.