3 ms·
You're being too literal. There are lots of "sounds" that have no objective correlates at all. What do we do with those [conflicting] subjective "truths" when
by carapace 6y ago
You're being too literal. There are lots of "sounds" that have no objective correlates at all. What do we do with those [conflicting] subjective "truths" when there is no meter?
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoFirst, azangru was talking about "statements about the physical world". For that kind of statement, if there is no objective correlate, then you're kind of in a quantum "many worlds" vs. "collapse" situation. That is, people have opinions, but it produces no actual physical difference which one is true, and many people have concluded that the dispute is both unproveable and pointless. And if we're talking about something that isn't physical, I suggest that it's still the same. If there is no objective correlate, then... let people have their opinions, but don't label either side "truth".
- carapace 6y agoAh, you're right, azangru was being more literal than metaphorical, I didn't read carefully enough.