3 ms·
yeah, except they don't have to go through the FAA this time >_>. /s What drove me nuts about the 737 fiasco, is that the military version of a 767 had a simi
by virtue3 6y ago
yeah, except they don't have to go through the FAA this time >_>. /s
What drove me nuts about the 737 fiasco, is that the military version of a 767 had a similar issue that was easily overridden by just... moving the stick.
https://qz.com/1718506/boeings-737-max-mcas-has-better-designed-military-forerunner/ https://qz.com/1718506/boeings-737-max-mcas-has-better-desig...
(the military aircraft is based on the 767 which only has rudimentary fly-by-wire for the spoilers along the wing, so everything else is hydraulic like the 737).
- p_l 6y agoThe military plane didn't have absurd economical reasons against increased pilot training that 737 MAX had.
- beamatronic 6y agoAh, you've found the solution. The military should go into the passenger business!