4 ms·
What do you think is unconvincing about them and in what way do you believe that expertise in Photoshop has any relation to this technology? At best Photoshop
by WhitneyLand 6y ago
What do you think is unconvincing about them and in what way do you believe that expertise in Photoshop has any relation to this technology?
At best Photoshop can play a role in covering tracks of evidence or artifacts of this much more sophisticated approach to faking identifies.
It’s not to say the developers and scientists at Adobe are lesser, it’s that it’s not the same tool or problem that’s being solved.
Put crudely Photoshop can let you draw a mustache on someone’s photo. This is about inventing a photo that never existed before.
- interestica 6y ago> in what way do you believe that expertise in Photoshop has any relation to this technology? They weren't expressing expertise in Photoshop. They were saying that basic use of it is the extent of their expertise. > What do you think is unconvincing about them Them being the 'experts' - they did nothing to convince other than say "I'm an expert in this thing."
- twak 6y ago> It’s not to say the developers and scientists at Adobe are lesser adobe research scientists are crazy-strong in the area of deep/neural graphics[1]. Perhaps we should disentangle adobe research from photoshop? [1] https://research.adobe.com/publications/ https://research.adobe.com/publications/