5 ms·

>Lots of engineer types freeze when they have to make a presentation. I remember a meeting early in my career with literally three people in a conference room a

>Lots of engineer types freeze when they have to make a presentation. I remember a meeting early in my career with literally three people in a conference room and I almost had a panic attack. That's definitely an unfortunate experience, but isn't giving presentations to explain your ideas - sometimes to people you don't really know - actually a significant part of the job? I'm an IC, and I present designs and project plans for feedback to groups of up to a couple dozen people, or to VPs, on a pretty regular basis. If I couldn't do that competently I would be failing at my job, because that kind of communication is just as important as actually writing the code. If I were conducting an interview and discovered that "public" speaking on the order of a few people in a conference room was extremely difficult for you, I'd probably consider that an important red flag.

tchaffee 6y ago
What is an IC? > isn't giving presentations to explain your ideas - sometimes to people you don't really know - actually a significant part of the job? For many engineering positions it is not. There are loads of shops where the developers, even senior developers, mostly just write code. I have hired many of them and put them to work successfully building stuff while I deal with the meetings. > If I were conducting an interview and discovered that "public" speaking on the order of a few people in a conference room was extremely difficult for you And yet I worked very successfully as a junior developer for a couple of years before I ever had to attend a meeting like that. Among the other 100 devs in the shop, I was considered a top talent at coding. That's not to brag but to point out that I was adding lots of value to the company without having to attend meetings with people from other departments. My manager did that. My manager did not code, although he could if he wanted to. In fact at that company they created a separate path for highly talented engineers who wanted to continue coding but wanted to avoid management and meetings. That was a couple of decades ago and less common, but I think it's a lot more common now. And the fact that I can now publicly speak in front of hundreds of people should hopefully encourage you that it's something people can learn if they want to. Some people don't want to. There are roles for them too.
- unclewalter 6y ago
  > What is an IC? Believe op is using it as "individual contributor"
  - arethuza 6y ago
    Isn't there just a bit of condescension in that title? It always sounds to me like something invented by a manager to be dismissive of someone who doesn't manage anyone.
    - VRay 6y ago
      I think you're projecting I've never heard of someone not liking the term "Individual Contributor" before
    - mindcrime 6y ago
      I never got the vibe that "IC" was intended to be dismissive, or intended to be a pejorative or anything. I think it's more of an HR thing, because the distinction between IC vs Manager usually affects compensation and blah, etc. Whether or not that should be the case is a separate question. I always assumed the term just leaked out of the HR world and into the general parlance.
    - dmoy 6y ago
      It depends on the culture setting. If you're in a place where an IC can potentially make half a million or million dollars a year and drive some very interesting project work and be highly respected, no. If you're in a place where not making it into manager track puts a very low ceiling on earning potential and respect, then yes it can be condescending. This varies a lot by country, industry, etc.
    - deleted 6y ago
      [deleted]
- GeneralMayhem 6y ago
  >What is an IC? Individual Contributor, used to contrast with "Manager". Point being, my main job is to design systems and write code, but I still have to do some of the organizational stuff sometimes. >There are loads of shops where the developers, even senior developers, mostly just write code. Okay, so your experience is different from mine. I'm surprised that there are places where this is really not a meaningful job requirement, and I've never worked at one, but I believe you. >it's something people can learn if they want to Sure... but so is coding. Part of the point of an interview is to see what skills and traits you already have. If you're missing some, that can be balanced against the ones you do have - it's not a dealbreaker, but it is still a negative. >Some people don't want to. There are roles for them too. Again, not where I work. Engineering, even at relatively junior levels, includes collaboration and explaining your work. You can't just say you don't want to do that - or rather, you can, but you'll have no upward mobility and be managed out pretty quickly.
yahyaheee 6y ago
That’s not the same as on the spot coding challenges in a whiteboard though
- TedDoesntTalk 6y ago
  You’re right. But what are you trying to prove with on the spot coding challenges? That the candidate can implement a hash table from scratch in 15 minutes with O(1) performance? Is that something they’re going to do on the job? Very unlikely. So why are you not only testing for it but testing for it in a fake time-pressured stressful situation that also rarely exists on the job? (Yes , we all have deadlines but when are they ever 15 minutes on the spot?) Perhaps you should have entered the education field where you could give such exams day after day to your heart’s content?
  - giantrobot 6y ago
    People giving on the spot coding exams, or worse whiteboard coding exams are just assholes. They're trying to haze interviewees and make themselves feel better. There's zero actual utility to such tasks in an interview.

tchaffee 6y ago

What is an IC? > isn't giving presentations to explain your ideas - sometimes to people you don't really know - actually a significant part of the job? For many engineering positions it is not. There are loads of shops where the developers, even senior developers, mostly just write code. I have hired many of them and put them to work successfully building stuff while I deal with the meetings. > If I were conducting an interview and discovered that "public" speaking on the order of a few people in a conference room was extremely difficult for you And yet I worked very successfully as a junior developer for a couple of years before I ever had to attend a meeting like that. Among the other 100 devs in the shop, I was considered a top talent at coding. That's not to brag but to point out that I was adding lots of value to the company without having to attend meetings with people from other departments. My manager did that. My manager did not code, although he could if he wanted to. In fact at that company they created a separate path for highly talented engineers who wanted to continue coding but wanted to avoid management and meetings. That was a couple of decades ago and less common, but I think it's a lot more common now. And the fact that I can now publicly speak in front of hundreds of people should hopefully encourage you that it's something people can learn if they want to. Some people don't want to. There are roles for them too.

unclewalter 6y ago
> What is an IC? Believe op is using it as "individual contributor"
- arethuza 6y ago
  Isn't there just a bit of condescension in that title? It always sounds to me like something invented by a manager to be dismissive of someone who doesn't manage anyone.
  - VRay 6y ago
    I think you're projecting I've never heard of someone not liking the term "Individual Contributor" before
  - mindcrime 6y ago
    I never got the vibe that "IC" was intended to be dismissive, or intended to be a pejorative or anything. I think it's more of an HR thing, because the distinction between IC vs Manager usually affects compensation and blah, etc. Whether or not that should be the case is a separate question. I always assumed the term just leaked out of the HR world and into the general parlance.
  - dmoy 6y ago
    It depends on the culture setting. If you're in a place where an IC can potentially make half a million or million dollars a year and drive some very interesting project work and be highly respected, no. If you're in a place where not making it into manager track puts a very low ceiling on earning potential and respect, then yes it can be condescending. This varies a lot by country, industry, etc.
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]
GeneralMayhem 6y ago
>What is an IC? Individual Contributor, used to contrast with "Manager". Point being, my main job is to design systems and write code, but I still have to do some of the organizational stuff sometimes. >There are loads of shops where the developers, even senior developers, mostly just write code. Okay, so your experience is different from mine. I'm surprised that there are places where this is really not a meaningful job requirement, and I've never worked at one, but I believe you. >it's something people can learn if they want to Sure... but so is coding. Part of the point of an interview is to see what skills and traits you already have. If you're missing some, that can be balanced against the ones you do have - it's not a dealbreaker, but it is still a negative. >Some people don't want to. There are roles for them too. Again, not where I work. Engineering, even at relatively junior levels, includes collaboration and explaining your work. You can't just say you don't want to do that - or rather, you can, but you'll have no upward mobility and be managed out pretty quickly.

yahyaheee 6y ago

That’s not the same as on the spot coding challenges in a whiteboard though

TedDoesntTalk 6y ago
You’re right. But what are you trying to prove with on the spot coding challenges? That the candidate can implement a hash table from scratch in 15 minutes with O(1) performance? Is that something they’re going to do on the job? Very unlikely. So why are you not only testing for it but testing for it in a fake time-pressured stressful situation that also rarely exists on the job? (Yes , we all have deadlines but when are they ever 15 minutes on the spot?) Perhaps you should have entered the education field where you could give such exams day after day to your heart’s content?
- giantrobot 6y ago
  People giving on the spot coding exams, or worse whiteboard coding exams are just assholes. They're trying to haze interviewees and make themselves feel better. There's zero actual utility to such tasks in an interview.