> but you have to take into account how many people die in other cars in general I do and I see a completely different topic. What's your point? That people di

> but you have to take into account how many people die in other cars in general I do and I see a completely different topic. What's your point? That people die in accidents? Sure. That companies should be allowed to mislead even if this leads to deaths? Those deaths in "other cars" are not because the manufacturer mislead the consumer. And if they do they'll probably get the same treatment since there are laws against false advertising. It's done all the time [0]. The end result of all those practices is that the consumer is deliberately mislead into getting the wrong impression even without explicitly lying. There's nothing special about Tesla's case in this context. > This is just blatantly false. No they don't. > Why would you even make such a claim that is so easy to check I checked and quoted from the Tesla website literally 5 cm above on your screen [1]. Feel free to point me to any other manufacturer who describes their technology like that. Or to any other 150.000 E car with advanced self driving tech whose driver attention detector can be tricked with an orange because the manufacturer refuses to implement proper systems based on cameras or capacitive sensors. Or to any manufacturer whose driver assists caused deaths. This isn't about technology failing. It's about intentionally proliferating an image of that technology that makes it look more capable than it actually is. Tesla's marketing material consistently makes people paint a false impression of the system. That in itself is a good enough reason to label it deceptive. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_advertising https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_advertising [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23843007 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23843007